home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!gwinnett!amfent!amf
- From: amf@amfent.Gwinnett.COM (Andy Feibus)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.misc
- Subject: Re: A comment from the left ...
- Message-ID: <oX91TB1w164w@amfent.Gwinnett.COM>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 92 11:56:59 EST
- References: <141024@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV>
- Lines: 14
-
- casey@gauss.llnl.gov (Casey Leedom) writes:
- > Also, I incorrectly claimed that Sun OS 4.1.1 wasn't POSIX compliant.
- > (Well, it may not be completely 1003.1 compliant, but I haven't gotten
- > far enough in compiling my software to see what facilities are present.
- > It's at least got the manual pages and header files for POSIX 1003.1
- > signal facilities.) This is 100% my fault for not checking more
- > thoroughly before blasting away at Pnews.
- Actually, it's not compliant. <wait.h>, if I remember right, is incorrect.
- Also, it was never certified as being compliant (first release to
- get the certification was 4.1.2).
-
- Cheers!
- -- Andy.
- andyfe@utoday.com
-