home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.sys.sun.hardware:5355 comp.sys.sun.misc:5098
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun.hardware,comp.sys.sun.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnews!adh
- From: adh@cbnews.cb.att.com (andrew.d.hay)
- Subject: Re: SparcStation 10 and multiprocessing
- Organization: AT&T
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 13:44:01 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov5.134401.14026@cbnews.cb.att.com>
- Keywords: Sparc10 Multiprocessing
- References: <11336@lochhead.ed.ac.uk> <1992Nov5.023821.27506@ra.msstate.edu>
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Nov5.023821.27506@ra.msstate.edu> fwp@CC.MsState.Edu (Frank Peters) writes:
- []
- "Solbourne's multiprocessor version of SunOS does a much better job than
- "Sun's code does. Its more mature (Solbourne has doing multiprocessor a
- "lot longer than Sun).
-
- question: will solbourne's os run on a sun sparc?
-
- --
- +--------------------------------------------------------------+
- Andrew Hay | I am not an expert, |
- a_d_hay@att.com | but I play one on the Internet! |
- +--------------------------------------------------------------+
-