home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!att-out!rutgers!ub!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!rickert
- From: rickert@cco.caltech.edu (Keith Warren Rickert)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
- Subject: Re: TAC - Who to contact.
- Message-ID: <1djoatINNkot@gap.caltech.edu>
- Date: 8 Nov 92 19:03:57 GMT
- References: <1992Nov6.181306.7251@odin.corp.sgi.com> <61822@mimsy.umd.edu> <BxEuC5.G3q@rahul.net>
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 16
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sandman.caltech.edu
-
- In <BxEuC5.G3q@rahul.net> jonathan@rahul.net (Jonathan Heiliger) writes:
-
- >In article <61822@mimsy.umd.edu> dong@umiacs.umd.edu (Dong Chen) writes:
-
- >>There're still could be problem here. For many big company or school,
- >>all out going calls has the same call-id.
-
- > True. But I think that some PBXs support the full number coming through.
- >So even though at the time of the call it might not show the callers
- >full/correct number, if it was a nuisance call I'm sure PacBell could audit
- >the trail.
-
- I dont believe that the original poster meant call-id as in
- a caller-id system, but rather the internal call-id's that the TAC
- uses to refer to a particular caller and his/her bugs/complaints/etc.
- Keith
-