home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!psgrain!charnel!rat!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!coco
- From: coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (felix.lugo)
- Subject: Re: printf g format still broken under NeXTSTEP 3.0
- Organization: AT&T
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:33:24 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov11.033324.9278@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
- References: <1992Nov11.012228.23372@access.usask.ca>
- Lines: 12
-
- In article <1992Nov11.012228.23372@access.usask.ca> eric@skatter.usask.ca writes:
- | I reported this bug in December 1989, and when NeXTSTEP 2.0 came out,
- | and when NeXTSTEP 2.1 arrived, and now that NeXTSTEP 3.0 has arrived ...
- | IT STILL ISN'T FIXED!!!!!
- |
-
- I thought compiler problems were supposed to be reported to the GNU
- people. This one certainly fits that category! BTW, GCC 2.1 generates the
- same output as (NeXT 3.0) GCC 1.93.
-
- --Felix
-
-