home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / comp / sys / next / programm / 7138 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-10  |  935 b   |  23 lines

  1. Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.programmer
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!news.tek.com!psgrain!charnel!rat!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnewsm!cbnewsl!coco
  3. From: coco@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (felix.lugo)
  4. Subject: Re: printf g format still broken under NeXTSTEP 3.0 
  5. Organization: AT&T
  6. Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 03:33:24 GMT
  7. Message-ID: <1992Nov11.033324.9278@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
  8. References: <1992Nov11.012228.23372@access.usask.ca>
  9. Lines: 12
  10.  
  11. In article <1992Nov11.012228.23372@access.usask.ca> eric@skatter.usask.ca writes:
  12. | I reported this bug in December 1989, and when NeXTSTEP 2.0 came out,
  13. | and when NeXTSTEP 2.1 arrived, and now that NeXTSTEP 3.0 has arrived ...
  14. | IT STILL ISN'T FIXED!!!!!
  15.  
  16.     I thought compiler problems were supposed to be reported to the GNU
  17. people.  This one certainly fits that category!  BTW, GCC 2.1 generates the
  18. same output as (NeXT 3.0) GCC 1.93.
  19.  
  20. --Felix
  21.  
  22.