home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!nobody
- From: gbrown@raven.ctr.columbia.edu (Glenn Brown)
- Subject: Re: MATLAB (the missing piece)
- References: <n9d1Hg#uta@atlantis.psu.edu>
- Sender: nobody@ctr.columbia.edu
- Organization: J. Random Misconfigured Site
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 06:38:00 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.063800.29557@sol.ctr.columbia.edu>
- X-Posted-From: raven.ctr.columbia.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: sol.ctr.columbia.edu
- Lines: 37
-
- >I'm going to have to disagree on the contention, "Personally, I think
- >that
- >considering the size of the NeXT market, we should be thankful that
- >MATLAB
- >will be ported to the NeXT at all." If it is cost-effective for Maple,
- >Mathematica, FrameMaker, Illustrator, Improv, etc. to be ported to
- >NeXTstep, it should be cost-effective for MATLAB or MATRIXx to be ported.
- >NeXT IS losing sales because of the absence of numerical analysis tools.
-
- I'll explain myself a little more clearly: We are fortunate that the NeXT
- market is large enough that it is profitable for the Math Works, Inc. to
- port their product to the NeXT. Although I, too, wish that there were
- more software packages available for our superior architecture, it is
- silly to blaim the software vendors for refusing do something they _know_
- will lose money:
-
- Just because there is a Kroger a block from your house doesn't mean that
- it would be profitable for a Food World (or even a mini-mart) to be built
- across the street from it. If you want a plethora of services at your
- door, either move to the heart of a big city, or encourage others to move
- into your neighborhood creating a larger market.
-
- If you want to see more NeXT applications, do not yell at the vendors.
- They are the little guys in the picture. The only entity with the power
- to manipulate the economic reality is NeXT itself. It can draw more
- software vendors to the NeXT if it can create a larger installed base.
- The fastest way to do that is to port NeXTstep to existing machines and
- sell the software to the people who already own fast machines, if this is
- possible. That way NeXT can offer them a huge added value to the buyer's
- machine for relatively low cost if NeXTstep is as superior as we think it
- is. The questions are now: can NeXT do this profitably?
-
- >I may be out to lunch--but I'm STILL pissed off!
-
- That is, indeed, understandable.
-
- --Glenn Brown
-