home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!nhaldar
- From: nhaldar@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Neil A Haldar)
- Subject: Re: New RISC chip?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov6.121324.21742@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: magnusug.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University
- References: <1992Nov6.112552.21376@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 12:13:24 GMT
- Lines: 31
-
- In article <1992Nov6.112552.21376@blaze.cs.jhu.edu> swiet@syzygy.cs.jhu.edu (Al
- exander Swietlicki) writes:
- > I picked up a copy of Byte today, and aside from a mediocre
- >review of NeXT (no fair, they placed a mono classic slab against machines
- >priced in the $10-$36,000 range and complained), there was a blurb about
- >some new RISC chip: the IMS3250 which is supposed to run at 100 Mhz, 90 Mips,
- >and be able to emulate both a 486@25Mhz and a 68040@30Mhz. Here's the
- >kicker: it's supposed to cost between $50 and $60 in production quantities.
- >Wonder what effect this'll have on the industry? Heheh...imagine: NeXTSTEP
- >and NeXTSTEP486 on the same box. :)
-
- Umm... this ISN'T the same chip going in the PowerPC/Pink thingy between
- Apple/IBM, right? I can see the 486 emulation, but for the 68040 emulation...
- wow...
-
- I'd gander that the methods of memory allocation and caching are completely
- different between the Intel and Motorola lines, and I can't believe that
- someone's solved that problem at that low a price...
-
- Gotta run out and find that issue of Byte!
-
- -Neil
- *> Neil Haldar <*
- *> nhaldar@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu <*
- *> neilh@well.sf.ca.us <*
- *> 364 West Lane Ave #225, Cols., OH 43201 614.299.8529 <*
- --
- *> Neil Haldar <*
- *> nhaldar@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu <*
- *> neilh@well.sf.ca.us <*
- *> 364 West Lane Ave #225, Cols., OH 43201 614.299.8529 <*
-