home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!dziuxsolim.rutgers.edu!gandalf.rutgers.edu!szatrows
- From: szatrows@gandalf.rutgers.edu (John Kheit)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.hardware
- Subject: Re: Fragmentation & performance
- Message-ID: <Nov.5.23.30.30.1992.1546@gandalf.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 04:30:31 GMT
- References: <Nov.5.01.28.54.1992.15738@gandalf.rutgers.edu> <1992Nov5.173551.8841@kakwa.ucs.ualberta.ca>
- Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
- Lines: 22
-
- I've had my swap file grow to 400+ megs!!!! But that wasnt what
- really trashed my drive. I was moving literally hundreds of thousands
- of files around and some were HUGE and some were incredibly tiny.
- Anyway if you move that much stuff around you hard drive things start
- to get mushed to and fro after time. Again after doing a rebuild the
- system was running at least 50% faster. The swap space may have been
- part of the problem.
-
- I know that unix takes measures to prevent fragmantation but
- nothing to take care of the INEVITABLE fragmentation that will occur.
- On the mac there used to be an init (daemon more or less) that used to
- defragment the drive in the background. Something like this would
- work wonders for a NeXT system; the NeXT seems to be a BIG mover of
- data-- much more data flow than your average workstation or PC (at
- least from what I've seen).
-
- later, John
- --
- NeXT Campus Consultant---Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey |my %^)
- John Kheit/monoChrome | |fried %-)
- 173 Westgate Drive | Audix#5512 |brain %>)
- Edison, NJ 08820-1163 | kheit@hangout.rutgers.edu,szatrows@gandalf.rutgers.edu
-