home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!news
- From: benkei@cs.utexas.edu (William Kent Richards)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Subject: Re: PowerBooks - 210 v. 160 as Midrange champ
- Date: 7 Nov 1992 03:20:11 -0600
- Organization: U Texas Dept of Computer Sciences, Austin TX
- Lines: 67
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <lfn2ibINNeeb@nada.cs.utexas.edu>
- References: <1992Nov05.134836.92049@bmug.org>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: nada.cs.utexas.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov05.134836.92049@bmug.org> David_A._Schnider@bmug.org writes:
-
- >battery, cahrger, case, and RAM). The 160 also comes with a built in drive
- >and a better monitor and trackball. The advantage of the dock is that it is
- >expandable. That is the real division. If you are going to want to buy an
- >040 processor for your PB you want to spend the $1000 more on the DUO.
- >Otherwise the 160 is a much better choice.
-
- From my perspective, the Duo completely blew away the powerbook according
- to both MacUser and MacWorld reviews.
-
- Advantages of Duo over Powerbook: (compiled from MacUser and MacWorld
- reviews)
- - *much* lighter weight (unless you take the MiniDock and floppy with
- you every where you go, and with the Duo you have the option of
- leaving them behind, or going with the floppy adapter instead)
- - *much* larger batter capacity _standard_, with third-parties offering
- self-powered (battery) docks and auxilliary battery packs that
- extend the power even more (and already exist)
- - quick recharging battery (1 hour)
- - ability to change batteries without losing any data (internal lithium
- batteries hold the fort while you get a new battery in place)
- - capability for better video (DuoDock, third-party mini docks)
- - capability for much expandibility, versitality through third-party
- add ons
- - install memory yourself without voiding warranty
- - less expensive memory (DRAM)
- - modem runs partly on system software with the CPU, so new functions
- can be implemented with software updates
- - faster in almost all categories tested (though only slightly)
- - auto sleep when lid is closed
- - power switch more accessible
-
- Other advantages (from me and others on the net):
- - better screen controls
- - only $1000 to get a desktop machine comparable in speed to stock Ci
-
- According to the review in MacWorld, most editors and reviewers there
- liked the keyboard, and particularly liked the trackball compared to
- the powerbook trackball. (Two people hated the trackball). The
- reviewer thought the keyboard was more responsive compared to the
- powerbook keyboard. The reviewer also felt that the trackball was
- very smooth, and less obtrusive than the powerbook trackball.
-
- In both reviews, the Duo's performed about the same (210) or faster
- (230) at most tasks (except math without FPU) in 8-bit color mode
- using the DuoDock with 512K VRAM. The Ci was a 5/80 in MacUser and a
- 8/80 in MacWorld - both were using internal video (8-bit) and a 32K
- cache card. The Duo's get a little faster in 8-bit mode when using
- 1meg VRAM (according to MacWorld).
-
- Disadvantages:
- - detached floppy
- - more expensive (and 0.15 pounds heavier) for similar mechanical
- features (floppy and other connectors).
- - modem slows down system a bit, and takes up 300k of memory when
- in use
- - tinny sounding speaker
- - smaller screen (though same data displayed)
-
- Now, this is or course my interpretation of the articles. Others
- may read them differently.
-
- --
-
- Kent Richards "Practice acts of random kindness
- benkei@cs.utexas.edu and senseless beauty"
-