home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!inews.Intel.COM!mipos2!jwreilly
- From: jwreilly@mipos2.intel.com (Jeffrey Reilly)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.intel
- Subject: Re: 386/486 differences
- Summary: benchmarks performance
- Message-ID: <Bx9unC.I1y@inews.Intel.COM>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 01:54:47 GMT
- References: <7944@transfer.stratus.com>
- Sender: news@inews.Intel.COM (USENET News System)
- Organization: Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA USA
- Lines: 40
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mipos2
-
- In article <7944@transfer.stratus.com> scol@scottsdale.az.stratus.com (Scott Colbath) writes:
- >
- >Could someone tell me which would provide better performance between the
- >following two choices.
- >
- >1) 486 SX 25MHz
- >
- > OR
- >
- >2) 386 DX 33MHZ
-
- The following information is available:
-
- On 16 bit Integer code:
-
- CPU ZIFF DAVIS Bench Processor Test
- -----------------------------------------------
- 25MHz 80486SX 6792.91
- 33MHz 80386DX 5044.00
-
- On 32 bit Integer Code
-
- CPU SPECint92
- ------------------------------------------------
- 25MHz 80486SX 14.24
- 33MHz 80386DX 8.35
-
- In both cases, the 25MHz 80486SX offers the better perfomance.
-
- >
- >These are the two choices I am considering for my first PC. All other aspects
- >of the PC's are tha same on both the machines including price.
- >
- >All info is greatly appreciated.
-
- Jeff
-
- Jeff Reilly Performance Benchmarking And Analysis
- jwreilly@mipos2.intel.com Intel Corporation
- (408) 765 - 5909 Santa Clara, California
-