home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: myers@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM (Bob Myers)
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 20:35:23 GMT
- Subject: Re: Should HP 720 monitors be left on when not in use?
- Message-ID: <7371455@hpfcso.FC.HP.COM>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!sdd.hp.com!scd.hp.com!hpscdm!cupnews0.cup.hp.com!hppad.waterloo.hp.com!hppad!hpfcso!myers
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.hp
- References: <Bx5Gpt.8q6@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Lines: 50
-
-
- While Clarke already posted a pretty good response, I thought I'd add a
- few words. Again, the standard disclaimer - the following does NOT
- constitute an "official" statement by HP. But I am working on displays
- here, and when pressed will admit to knowing a few of the more common
- answers.
-
- First, I always recommend turning the display off when leaving for extended
- periods - which includes turning it off overnight. To be sure, *excessive*
- power cycling can result in reliability problems (from thermal shock, for
- one reason), but turning off for overnight or longer prevents both energy
- waste and reliability problems of another type: the aging of the CRT.
-
- The CRT is, on average, the shortest-lived component of any CRT display,
- and unfortunately continues to age whenever powered up, as the cathode is
- generally *always* active. "Screen-savers" do not help all that much -
- they will prevent patterns from "burning into" the phosphor, but the
- cathode will continue to age as long as the tube is powered up and
- biased. Even when blanked, the cathode ages. Actually, for most tubes,
- the aging is slightly MORE rapid when the screen is blanked, due to the
- "cloud" of electrons from the cathode being forced to stay in the cathode
- region and thus increasing the rate of cathode "poisoning." Turning the
- display OFF is the only way to stop this (since most display don't allow
- you to turn down the heater voltage!).
-
- An additional question came up having to do with the "wavering" of nearby
- screens. This can be caused by a number of things:
-
- 1. The line transient caused by power-cycling a display on the same AC
- circuit (which Clarke mentioned),
-
- 2. The degaussing action at power up (on color displays only), as was also
- mentioned by another respondent, and
-
- 3. The interaction or "beat" between the magnetic fields from the vertical
- deflection coils of the two monitors. No two monitors, even those at the
- same nominal refresh rate, are exactly in sync, and their deflection
- fields can interact to produce "swimming" or "jitter." This problem
- is greatly reduced in the most recent monitors which conform to various
- standards for magnetic field emissions (such as MPR-II), although you
- may still have a problem if the *affected* monitor is overly susceptible
- to external fields. (The most recent HP workstation monitors - A1097C/D,
- A2088A, and A2094A - are all MPR-compliant, and so should emit much lower-
- intensity fields than earlier products - EXCEPT during the power-up degauss,
- as mentioned above.)
-
-
- Bob Myers KC0EW Hewlett-Packard Co. |Opinions expressed here are not
- User Interface Tech. Div.|those of my employer or any other
- myers@fc.hp.com Fort Collins, Colorado |sentient life-form on this planet.
-