home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!know!mips2!news.bbn.com!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!math.fu-berlin.de!uni-paderborn.de!uni-paderborn.de!usenet
- From: tron@uni-paderborn.de (Matthias Scheler)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: physical memory protection with MMU
- Keywords: mmu, memory, task
- Message-ID: <nn.geht.nicht.die-zweite.121192@uni-paderborn.de>
- Date: 13 Nov 92 00:49:40 GMT
- References: <1992Oct26.162400@uni-paderborn.de> <heinz.04a3@edohwg.adsp.sub.org> <1992Nov10.154421.18725@cbis.ece.drexel.edu> <1dtp0rINN9jk@uni-paderborn.de> <1du485INNdbn@uni-paderborn.de>
- Organization: Uni Paderborn FB 17 Informatik GERMANY
- Lines: 27
- NNTP-Posting-Host: corinth-bb.uni-paderborn.de
-
- chandler@uni-paderborn.de (Martin Grote) writes:
-
- [stuff deleted]
-
- >However, to focus on my original intention again:
- >- is it impossible / too difficult?
-
- Too difficult, you can't build MMU tables for every 8 bytes of allocated
- memory. If you really would know how a MMU works and how Operating Systems
- with "Memory Protection" work you would know that it is impossible to put
- this in AmigaDOS without loosing 99.9% of the software. It's easy to
- scream for memory protection if you never wrote a program and don't know
- the concept of AmigaOS.
-
- >- any disadvantages (does it have slow down the system)?
-
- A little bit, and you would loose 99% of the software.
- Didn't I say that already :-) ?
-
- >- if not, how about implementing it?
-
- Do it, if it's so easy.
-
- --
- Matthias Scheler tron@uni-paderborn.de
- University of Paderborn (Germany)
- ,
-