home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!sdd.hp.com!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!ames!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!rutgers!cbmvax!peter
- From: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
- Subject: Re: Listview -vs- Intuiticks
- Message-ID: <36842@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Date: 10 Nov 92 17:15:12 GMT
- References: <1992Nov6.131900.5867@cci632.cci.com> <36779@cbmvax.commodore.com> <1992Nov9.213103.3388@cci632.cci.com>
- Reply-To: peter@cbmvax.commodore.com (Peter Cherna)
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: Commodore-Amiga, Inc. West Chester, PA.
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Nov9.213103.3388@cci632.cci.com> den@cci632.cci.com (Dennis J. Buttery) writes:
- >I am handling the INTUITICKS as they are received. It just doesn't seem very
- >practical though to have my application wake-up each time one is received.
- >Especially, since they are only there because of the Listview gadget.
- >BTW - I am using the GT_GetIMsg function in place of the regular GetMsg. which
- >I thought was designed to consume these unwanted event signals??
-
- GT_GetIMsg() does consume messages it _knows_ you don't need, such as
- minute changes in slider position that don't affect the coarse value,
- for example. However, it can't know that you don't want INTUITICKS,
- so it has no choice but to pass them down.
-
- Being prodded at INTUITICKS rate shouldn't be a problem, code-wise
- or performance-wise.
-
- > -DJB-
-
- Peter
- --
- Peter Cherna, User Interface Development Group, Commodore-Amiga, Inc.
- {uunet|rutgers}!cbmvax!peter peter@cbmvax.commodore.com
- My opinions do not necessarily represent the opinions of my employer.
- "I believe it's bad luck to be superstitious."
-