home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!mpifr-bonn.mpg.de!speckled.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de!mlelstv
- From: mlelstv@speckled.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de (Michael van Elst)
- Subject: Re: Secondary CPU cache for the Amiga
- Message-ID: <1992Nov10.021130.11183@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de>
- Sender: news@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
- Nntp-Posting-Host: speckled
- Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f"ur Radioastronomie
- References: <OAHVENLA.92Nov1142539@lk-hp-9.hut.fi> <OD.6BadNetOA92-901-231p0_52c45b1f@piraya.bad.se>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 02:11:30 GMT
- Lines: 14
-
- In <OD.6BadNetOA92-901-231p0_52c45b1f@piraya.bad.se> Mike_Noreen@anet.bbs.bad.se (Mike Noreen) writes:
- >Yes, but if you've already got a A3000 (with '030), wouldn't it be rather nice
- >to double performance using - say - 512k SRAM? This wouldnt have to be very
- >expensive; less than one tenth of an average '040 accelerator for the A3000...
-
- If you just count the SRAM chips... but just the SRAMs don't make a cache
- and just a cache doesn't make a marketed product.
-
- Regards,
- --
- Michael van Elst
- UUCP: universe!local-cluster!milky-way!sol!earth!uunet!unido!mpirbn!p554mve
- Internet: p554mve@mpirbn.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
- "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
-