home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!psinntp!psinntp!ncrlnk!ncr-mpd!kentd
- From: kentd@FtCollins.NCR.com (Kent Dalton)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.applications
- Subject: Re: FinalCopy
- Message-ID: <KENTD.92Nov9093226@zappa.FtCollins.NCR.com>
- Date: 9 Nov 92 09:32:26 GMT
- References: <jmarin.721216713@messi.uku.fi>
- Sender: uucp@ncr-mpd.FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM
- Organization: NCR Microelectronics, Ft. Collins, CO
- Lines: 27
- In-reply-to: jmarin@messi.uku.fi's message of 8 Nov 92 09:58:33 GMT
-
- >>>>> On 8 Nov 92 09:58:33 GMT, jmarin@messi.uku.fi (Jukka Marin) said:
-
- Jukka> BUT the fonts look horrible on screen. In interlaced display
- Jukka> modes they are somewhat readable, in non-interlaced modes they
- Jukka> look pretty terrible. If this was just a preview mode it would
- Jukka> be okay, but I can't imagine of editing texts for hours or days
- Jukka> or weeks with that "quality" of fonts.
-
- Jukka> Yes, I could use the 150% or 200% magnification to make the fonts
- Jukka> look better - but then I could only see a small portion of the
- Jukka> page (I want to see all columns all the time, at least).
-
- How big are your pages? I typically can see the entire width of my text
- (on a 8.5"x11" page) at 125% using 640x400 with overscan.
-
- Generally, I haven't been too bothered by the screen fonts. It probably
- depends on what type of writing you are doing and how flexible you are
- about using the magnification feature.
-
- --
- /**************************************************************************/
- /* Kent Dalton * EMail: Kent.Dalton@FtCollinsCO.NCR.COM */
- /* NCR Microelectronics * Phone: (303) 223-5100 X-319 */
- /* 2001 Danfield Ct. MS470A * FAX: (303) 226-9556 */
- /* Fort Collins, Colorado 80525 * */
- /**************************************************************************/
- When this load is DONE I think I'll wash it AGAIN..
-