home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!eff!world!mv!objects
- From: mjv@mv.com
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Subject: Re: Array anachronisms
- Message-ID: <9211121744013030@mv.com>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 12:44:01 GMT
- Article-I.D.: mv.9211121744013030
- Lines: 17
- X-Mailer: rnMac Buggy, I mean Beta, Test Version
-
-
- > From: jimad@microsoft.com (Jim Adcock)
- > Subject: Re: Array anachronisms
- > Message-ID: <1992Nov11.004038.17772@microsoft.com>
- > Date: 11 Nov 92 00:40:38 GMT
- > Since non-C-braindead-flavors of arrays can easily be implemented using
- > templates, why invent a new slightly-less-braindead implementation of
- > arrays built-in to C++? Instead, lobby the C++ libraries committee to
- > put the arrays features you like into their proposed array class
- template.
-
- Sounds reasonable. I look forward to seeing a proposal and/or suggested
- improvement to the current proposal (X3J16/92-0005R1, WG21/N0084).
- --
- Mike Vilot, ObjectCraft Inc., Nashua NH USA
- mjv@objects.mv.com
- X3J16 Library WG
-