home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!csn!raven!rcd
- From: rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn)
- Newsgroups: comp.software-eng
- Subject: Re: Will we keep ignoring this productivity issue?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov12.083454@eklektix.com>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 08:34:54 GMT
- References: <1776@aviary.Stars.Reston.Unisys.COM> <1992Nov11.055130@eklektix.com> <1992Nov11.173103.15814@blaze.cs.jhu.edu>
- Organization: eklektix - Boulder, Colorado
- Lines: 27
-
- wilson@rhombus.cs.jhu.edu (Dwight Wilson) writes:
- >[I quoted Bob Munck about order-of-magnitude variation in productivity,
- suggested it might be more]
-
- >Before we try to fix this problem, does anyone have
- >analogous numbers for other professions?...
-
- Hold on - what is the "problem" here? (I want to get the right frame of
- reference...I want to be sure that we're not considering excess produc-
- tivity a "problem".)
-
- >...I would expect that
- >professions demanding high creativity would have a large
- >difference between the best practitioners and average ones, and
- >an order of magnitude is not particularly surprising.
-
- Perhaps it's not surprising that the difference exists...but I think it
- *is* surprising that we ignore it! We're trying to create software; we
- need lots of software to meet all the (perceived) needs. Software is
- undeniably expensive. Some folks are still whining about a "software
- crisis". If it matters at all, why would we ignore such profound differ-
- ences in productivity, rather than trying to find out something about what
- characterizes them?? The "problem", if there is one, is that we're
- ignoring a substantial resource.
- --
- Dick Dunn rcd@raven.eklektix.com -or- raven!rcd Boulder, Colorado
- ...Simpler is better.
-