home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / comp / protocol / ppp / 893 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-14  |  998 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sdd.hp.com!caen!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!pisa.citi.umich.edu!rees
  2. From: rees@pisa.citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp
  4. Subject: Re: asyncmap rationale (was Re: PPP via intermediate links)
  5. Date: 13 Nov 1992 17:02:15 GMT
  6. Organization: University of Michigan CITI
  7. Lines: 8
  8. Distribution: world
  9. Message-ID: <5c58857d.1bc5b@pisa.citi.umich.edu>
  10. References: <1ck9arINNjro@gap.caltech.edu> <BOB.92Nov3145722@volitans.MorningStar.Com> <BOB.92Nov13105133@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
  11. Reply-To: Jim.Rees@umich.edu
  12. NNTP-Posting-Host: pisa.citi.umich.edu
  13.  
  14. In article <BOB.92Nov13105133@volitans.MorningStar.Com>, bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
  15.  
  16.   If the initial asyncmap were 256 "1" bits, what byte range would you
  17.   use for negotiations?
  18.  
  19. Obviously, the initial negotiation should be done using nothing but 7-bit
  20. printing ascii characters.  Certainly it shouldn't depend on being able to
  21. send 7f or ff transparently!
  22.