home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!pisa.citi.umich.edu!rees
- From: rees@pisa.citi.umich.edu (Jim Rees)
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.ppp
- Subject: Re: PPP via intermediate links
- Date: 12 Nov 1992 20:26:44 GMT
- Organization: University of Michigan CITI
- Lines: 11
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <5c5436cd.1bc5b@pisa.citi.umich.edu>
- References: <1ck9arINNjro@gap.caltech.edu> <BOB.92Nov3145722@volitans.MorningStar.Com>
- Reply-To: Jim.Rees@umich.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pisa.citi.umich.edu
-
- In article <BOB.92Nov3145722@volitans.MorningStar.Com>, bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes:
-
- Since
- 0xff is outside the range that can be negotiated using the LCP
- Async-Control-Character-Map mechanism, some special means must be
- exercised to keep it from being a part of the user data stream.
-
- Surely you're not serious. The ppp folks provided an escape mechanism for
- characters that can't be sent transparently, then limited the scope of that
- mechanism? That seems seriously stupid to me. What could they possibly
- have been thinking?
-