home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!sun-barr!ames!saimiri.primate.wisc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!usc!news.service.uci.edu!ucivax!gateway
- From: Stef@nma.com (Einar Stefferud)
- Subject: Re: X400 address
- Message-ID: <5579.721010257@nma.com>
- In-reply-to: Your message of 05 Nov 1992 16:30:30 +0000.
- <1992Nov5.163030.29308@chsun.chuug.ch>
- Newsgroups: comp.protocols.iso.x400
- Reply-To: Stef@nma.com
- Approved: usenet@q2.ics.uci.edu
- Lines: 20
- Date: 6 Nov 92 02:51:45 GMT
-
- Simon and Paul --
-
- I believe the problem is solved if we just choose another name for the
- virtual ADMD Service that is described in X.402 for AMDMD=" ", adn get
- our fellow ADMD service providers to sell message exchange services to
- PRMD operators that sign up for this service.
-
- All that is needed is for the cooperating service providers to
- exchange reachability information (E.g., DNS MX type information), adn
- then go aobut their business of routing and switching mail.
-
- Thsi is the model that I expect to underlay C=US; A=INTERNET, and we
- will surely invite the commercial ADMD service providers to support
- A=INTERNET by attaching to the Internet and exchanging mail with
- A=INTERNET values in ORAddresses.
-
- Those who do will find a revenue source in the Internet connection,
- and those who don't won't.
-
- N% of something is more than 100% of nothing...\Stef
-