home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!portal!lll-winken!fnnews.fnal.gov!mp.cs.niu.edu!linac!att!cbnewsc!bdewbank
- From: bdewbank@cbnewsc.cb.att.com (bryan.d.ewbank)
- Newsgroups: comp.programming
- Subject: Re: first-year programming languages
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.171915.26423@cbnewsc.cb.att.com>
- Date: 13 Nov 92 17:19:15 GMT
- References: <1992Nov9.152324.2715@jarvis.csri.toronto.edu> <wingo-111192171446@wingosmac.apple.com>
- Distribution: na
- Organization: AT&T
- Lines: 16
-
- The first language in a computer science should be a machine language or
- two. Perhaps a single-address machine, a double address machine, and
- something "unusual".
-
- The reason I say that is that computer science is different than simply
- training coders. Any general-purpose language will do to train coders,
- but computer science folk need to understand the tools of their trade.
-
- Using a machine language also points out -- at a gut level -- that all
- languages really do the same thing. it's just the syntax and the ease
- of use that differs. It is possible to write a spell-checker in Fortran,
- but it ain't pretty.
- --
- - Bryan Ewbank, b_d_ewbank@att.com | ``Whatever you do, work at it with
- AT&T Bell Labs, 2000 N Naperville Rd | all your heart, as working for the
- Naperville IL 60566 | Lord, not for men.'' -- Col 3:23
-