home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os9
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!watserv2.uwaterloo.ca!watserv1!norton.uwaterloo.ca!bcwhite
- From: bcwhite@norton.uwaterloo.ca (Brian C. White)
- Subject: Re: Ultra C test results
- Message-ID: <BxGoLw.3L4@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca>
- Sender: news@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca
- Organization: University of Waterloo
- References: <1992Nov8.200254.7954@bernina.ethz.ch>
- Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1992 18:27:31 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Nov8.200254.7954@bernina.ethz.ch> stp@bernina.ethz.ch (Stephan Paschedag) writes:
- >
- >gcc -O -ob -mnostack-check -m68020
- > -fomit-frame-pointer -fforce-mem
- > -fcombine-regs 30477 17774
- >
-
- I was just looking over your compile list for comparing the various
- compilers and was surprised to see options like "-fcombine-regs" on
- the same line as "-O" (for gcc, I should add). I assumed that "-O"
- automatically turned on all such optimization. It would seem I was
- mistaken. What flags are turned on with "-O"? Could you provide a
- list?
-
- Brian
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- INTERNET: bcwhite@sunee.uwaterloo.ca |
- DELPHI: BrianWhite (@delphi.com) | #include <disclaimer.h>
- COMPUSERVE: 70313.3344 (@compuserve.com) |
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Any given program contains at least one bug and can be shortened
- by one instruction. Therefore, all programs can be
- shortened to one instruction that won't work.
-