home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.misc:36167 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:29566 comp.graphics:11766
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!ukma!gatech!concert!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware,comp.graphics
- Subject: Re: 24-bit color board for OS/2 2.0 ?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov11.210739.19007@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 11 Nov 92 21:07:39 GMT
- References: <1992Nov11.013046.1821@wam.umd.edu>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Distribution: usa
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 20
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov11.013046.1821@wam.umd.edu> adhir@wam.umd.edu (Al Dhir) writes:
- >
- >In any case, here's an interesting question, how much difference could it
- >possibly make between ISA and EISA? From what I understand, XGA-2 is co-
- >processed anyway, so the only time you'll see a big difference in speed is
- >when you move a large bitmap from memory to the screen. All drawing should
- >probably be about the same speed, no?
-
- I'd expect minimal gains with this board if the drivers are
- well-written. The 3-4x increase in data transfer speed will help, but
- I think you won't notice much except when very large blocks of memory
- are transfered, such as bitmaps or very complex drawings.
-
-
-
- --
- |) David Charlap | .signature confiscated by FBI due to
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu | an ongoing investigation into the
- ((|,) | source of these .signature virusses
- ~|~
-