home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!nigel.msen.com!hela.iti.org!cs.widener.edu!dsinc!satalink!bert.tyler
- From: bert.tyler@satalink.com (Bert Tyler)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc
- Subject: Re: 24-bit Color
- Message-ID: <4467.1100.uupcb@satalink.com>
- Date: 11 Nov 92 08:53:00 GMT
- Distribution: world
- Organization: Datamax/Satalink Connection * Ivyland, PA (215) 443-9434
- Reply-To: bert.tyler@satalink.com (Bert Tyler)
- Lines: 28
-
- MS>There's something else I don't understand. Why 24-bit color?
- MS>24 is not a power of 2, and from what I've heard the human eye
- MS>can only distinguish something like 87,000 different colors.
- MS>Seventeen bits would accomplish this, and 16 comes close enough
- MS>that you'd probably not know the difference. Anyone?
-
- Mike, 24 bits of color decomposes nicely into 8 bits for Red,
- 8 bits for Green, and 8 bits for Blue. 8 bits == 1 byte, which
- is nice and easy on both us programmer types and the folks who
- design the hardware.
-
- As to the human eye being able to distinguish only 87000 different
- colors - - The original VGA video DAC could set up palette entries
- using 6 bits each of Red, Green, and Blue. As an experiment,
- I've generated images consisting of 64 vertical bars, varying
- one of those components - say, varying the red component so that
- the image changed from black to red - and I could easily see exactly
- where the colors changed. If 6 bits of shading yielded gradients
- finer than my eyes could detect, I would have seen a smooth changeover
- as the colors shifted.
-
- Alas, I don't have the hardware that would let me make a similar
- test using, say, 256 shades of red.
-
- Bert Tyler (bert.tyler@satalink.com)
- ---
- . DeLuxe./386 1.25 #343sa . Did you expect mere proof to sway my opinion?
-
-