home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.ms-windows.misc:4428 comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware:29185
- Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!concert!rock!taco!garfield.catt.ncsu.edu!ricker
- From: ricker@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu (Patrick Lyerly)
- Subject: Re: ATI Ultra Pro vs. #9GXe
- Message-ID: <ricker.721203054@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu>
- Keywords: ati ultra pro #9gxe number nine video accelerators
- Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: North Carolina State University
- References: <dhess.721001807@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> <1992Nov6.163141.29490@seas.gwu.edu> <dhess.721159474@Xenon.Stanford.EDU>
- Distribution: comp
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 06:10:54 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- dhess@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Drew William Hess) writes:
-
- >prall@seas.gwu.edu (David C. Prall) writes:
-
- >>In article <dhess.721001807@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> dhess@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Drew William Hess) writes:
- >>>
-
- >Maybe we should write PC Magazine and others who use the Winbench suite
- >to warn them of this possibility. Hopefully they'll develop a benchmark
- >that reflects real system performance, say by taking a couple of
- >applications and timing how long it takes to perform everyday operations.
- >Even if the hardware vendors are not skewing their WINMARK results,
- >a benchmark like this one would give the consumer a more accurate picture
- >anyways.
-
- I think they already do this. They usually show benchmarks with programs
- such as Lotus and Microsoft being shown. Just look at some of the
- graphs when they review a product.
-
- Hope this helps too.
-
- RickeR
-
- ricker@garfield.catt.ncsu.edu
-
-
-
-