home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!matt.ksu.ksu.edu!news
- From: danodom@matt.ksu.ksu.edu (Dan Odom)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.programmer
- Subject: Re: COMPILING SPEED
- Date: 8 Nov 1992 08:37:06 -0600
- Organization: Kansas State University
- Lines: 12
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <1dj8miINN6sl@matt.ksu.ksu.edu>
- References: <BwB79x.1sB@ecf.toronto.edu> <1992Nov6.102017.17897@sequent.com> <dmurdoch.253.721061938@mast.queensu.ca>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: matt.ksu.ksu.edu
-
- dmurdoch@mast.queensu.ca (Duncan Murdoch) writes:
-
- >Why do people accept such slow compile times? Turbo Pascal demonstrates
- >that fast compiler technology exists. Is C++ five times harder to compile
- >than TP?
-
- Yes, it is. Go write a compiler for Pascal. Then write a compiler for
- C++. You'll see.
- --
- Dan Odom
- Kansas State University
- danodom@matt.ksu.ksu.edu
-