home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Path: sparky!uunet!ukma!darwin.sura.net!uvaarpa!concert!samba!usenet
- From: Bill.Saunders@launchpad.unc.edu (Bill Saunders)
- Subject: Distributed computing under Linux?
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.002947.10579@samba.oit.unc.edu>
- Sender: usenet@samba.oit.unc.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lambada.oit.unc.edu
- Organization: University of North Carolina Extended Bulletin Board Service
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 00:29:47 GMT
- Lines: 55
-
- Hello all,
- I'm wondering if anyone has thought of trying to get a
- multiprocessing system working under Linux? Last night I was
- trying to compile something while talking on the modem. I only
- have a 386-40mhz machine and the constant disk access was making
- things go slowly. I thought about speeding things up by setting
- up a network in my home with just a 386 motherboard and a hard
- drive and ethernet card. Then using X and Linux I would be able
- to transfer the source over to the second machine and compile it
- there without a speed loss.
- Then I thought about going to the minimal. What if all
- I had was the 386 and memory and ethernet card? It wouldn't speed
- up disk access(in fact it would slow it down-across the ethernet),
- but I could run another program over there and basically not
- slow down my machine. Could this be done? Does X running on the
- remote machine need a video card? A pretty inexpensive system
- with just a 386mb,4meg RAM, and a ethernet card coud be made. Probably
- less than $400 bucks. Would this be practical? Is it cheaper to
- get a 486-33mhz or two or three 386-40's?
- Then my brain had a massive surge of thought, what if
- someone rewrote the kernel and made it distributed? Networks
- are getting faster and faster. FDDI(fiber optics) can push 100Mb
- compared to 10Mb(not sure of units but sure of values) on
- ethernet. This would be a complicated job but it has been done.
- It would be easier to write a set of routines to do remote
- procedure calls. The benefit of rewriting the kernel would be
- that less memory would be required on the remote(slave) computers.
- If we use X or remote procedure calls then the whole Linux kernel
- needs to be running on the remote machine.
- Last but not least. Did anyone read in DDJ in July and
- August about PORT. If what I read coalessed correctly in my brain
- PORT is a intermediate P-code like language very fast to interpret.
- If someone would write an interpreter for this for several different
- machines then we could have multivender multiprocessing. IE my
- TRS-80 could help by calculating one pixel of my fractal while the
- rest of the fractal was calculated by my machine(ha ha). I don't
- see any other way of using this other than RPC's(remote procedure
- calls) but still I know of several fast machines at the university.
- It would be great to be able to use them to speed somethings up.
- AnywayS, the main question is - is it possible to hook up
- a 386 Mb, 4Meg RAM, a remote booting ethernet card and run Linux
- and X on it?????
- Bill Saunders
- bills@outlaw.uwyo.edu
- ps- sorry for the long post!
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
- Speed kills - but at least it's a quick way to die!
- -------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- --
- The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of the University of
- North Carolina at Chapel Hill, the Campus Office for Information
- Technology, or the Experimental Bulletin Board Service.
- internet: laUNChpad.unc.edu or 152.2.22.80
-