home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.linux:15876 alt.test:14608
- Path: sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!alsaggaf
- From: alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu (M. Saggaf)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux,kl.test,alt.test
- Subject: Re: Anyone compile gwm-1.7 with Linux ?
- Message-ID: <ALSAGGAF.92Nov6083902@carbonara.mit.edu>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 13:39:09 GMT
- References: <andre.53@maties.sun.ac.za> <ALSAGGAF.92Nov5175231@alfredo.mit.edu>
- <1992Nov6.101802@informatik.uni-kl.de>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- Lines: 17
- In-Reply-To: l_kornst%informatik.uni-kl.de@stepsun.uni-kl.de's message of Fri, 6 Nov 1992 09:18:02 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: carbonara.mit.edu
-
- >>>>> On Fri, 6 Nov 1992 09:18:02 GMT, l_kornst%informatik.uni-kl.de@stepsun.uni-kl.de (Leif Kornstaedt) said:
-
- LK> In article <ALSAGGAF.92Nov5175231@alfredo.mit.edu>, alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu (M. Saggaf) writes:
- LK> |> If you want to compile gwm, you have to use lex and yacc. Flex and
- LK> |> bison won't do.
- LK> |>
-
- LK> Yes, perhaps, but where can one get a lex or a yacc? I thought they were
- LK> (c) AT&T. I too had many problems with bison and would like to get an
- LK> implementation closer to the original.
-
- I don't know. When I compiled gwm, I did the lex and yacc part on an
- Ultrix box and the rest in linux.
-
- --
- /M. Saggaf
- alsaggaf@athena.mit.edu
-