home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!decwrl!decwrl!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!asjl
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.misc
- Subject: Re: Inter-Network Mail Guide
- Message-ID: <BxEtIs.4z0@comp.vuw.ac.nz>
- From: Andy.Linton@comp.vuw.ac.nz (Andy Linton)
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 18:18:28 GMT
- Sender: news@comp.vuw.ac.nz (News Admin)
- References: <1992Nov5.024040.13063@kirk.bu.oz.au> <Bx9F6x.EK8@comp.vuw.ac.nz> <Bx9opq.36C@syd.dms.CSIRO.AU>
- Organization: Dept. of Comp. Sci., Victoria Uni. of Wellington, New Zealand.
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bats.comp.vuw.ac.nz
- Lines: 14
-
- In article <Bx9opq.36C@syd.dms.CSIRO.AU> marka@syd.dms.CSIRO.AU (Mark Andrews) writes:
- >Not all that strange. DSTO is Defence Science and Technology Organization.
- >I would expect them to prevent any unknow traffic from crossing their
- >routers.
-
- I'd have thought that allowing email traffic through the routers
- wasn't exactly permitting "known" traffic. The choice of allowing SMTP
- and not ICMP packets is what seems strange.
-
- I'd have thought they'd be better served by having an MX record for
- each of their hosts (NOT a wild card MX) which pointed to a small set
- of firewall machines.
-
-
-