home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.mail.elm
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!linus!progress!bedford.progress.COM!tucker
- From: tucker@bedford.progress.COM (Kyle Tucker)
- Subject: Reply address diff from 2.3PL0->PL11
- Message-ID: <1992Nov13.162431.24562@progress.com>
- Sender: tucker@bahrain (Kyle Tucker)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bahrain
- Reply-To: tucker@bedford.progress.COM
- Organization: Progress Software Corp.
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 16:24:31 GMT
- Lines: 36
-
- I noticed when we went to Elm PL11 from PL0, the replies to mail from
- Mailer-Daemon stopped going to the original sender. As Postmaster, this made
- responses to user errors easy to whip out. Now PL11 makes the To: line
- Mailer-Daemon rather than the original sender. Which patch level was operating
- correctly?
-
- From daemon Fri Nov 13 11:13:14 1992
- Return-Path: <Mailer-Daemon>
- Received: by tahiti.bedford.progress.COM (4.1/pscdev2.2)
- id AB03349; Fri, 13 Nov 92 11:13:07 EST
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 11:13:07 EST
- From: Mailer-Daemon (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
- Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
- Message-Id: <9211131613.AB03349@tahiti.bedford.progress.COM>
- To: tucker
-
- ----- Transcript of session follows -----
- 550 nono... User unknown
-
- ----- Unsent message follows -----
- Return-Path: <tucker>
- Received: by tahiti.bedford.progress.COM (4.1/pscdev2.2)
- id AA03347; Fri, 13 Nov 92 11:13:07 EST
- From: tucker (Kyle Tucker)
- Message-Id: <9211131613.AA03347@tahiti.bedford.progress.COM>
- Subject: Test
- To: nono
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 92 11:13:05 EST
- X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
-
- Thanks in advance and sorry if this a FAQ!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- Kyle Tucker - Email Administrator | Progress Software Corporation
- tucker@bedford.progress.com | 14 Oak Park
- (617)280-4565 | Bedford, Mass. 01730
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
-