home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!ukma!netnews.louisville.edu!starbase.spd.louisville.edu!aldavi01
- From: aldavi01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu (Arlie Davis)
- Subject: Re: languages which allow the introduction of new operators
- Sender: news@netnews.louisville.edu (Netnews)
- Message-ID: <aldavi01.721602206@starbase.spd.louisville.edu>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 21:03:26 GMT
- Reply-To: Arlie Davis <aldavi01@starbase.spd.louisville.edu>
- References: <721458276@sheol.UUCP> <veit.721491920@du9ds3> <TB06.92Nov11165010@CS1.CC.Lehigh.EDU> <1992Nov12.082643.8415@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: starbase.spd.louisville.edu
- Organization: University of Louisville
- Lines: 13
-
- In <1992Nov12.082643.8415@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de> wb@arb-phys.uni-dortmund.de (Wilhelm B. Kloke) writes:
-
- > > >Lisp. Forth. Postscript. Smalltalk. Full PL/I had the ability
- > > >to coin new statement types and keywords (though not new
- > > >expression syntax).
- > >
- > > You forgot Prolog.
- > Add Ada, Algol68, TeX as well.
-
- While you're at it, add shell script. :)
-
- --
- lrwx------ 1 aldavi01 emacsstu 9 Jun 6 12:43 .signature -> /dev/null
-