home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!news.udel.edu!chopin.udel.edu!almquist
- From: almquist@chopin.udel.edu (Squish)
- Newsgroups: comp.graphics.animation
- Subject: FLI files or a working xflick?
- Message-ID: <BxAzFy.98q@news.udel.edu>
- Date: 6 Nov 92 16:35:57 GMT
- Article-I.D.: news.BxAzFy.98q
- Sender: usenet@news.udel.edu
- Organization: Human Interface Technology Lab (on vacation)
- Lines: 10
- Nntp-Posting-Host: chopin.udel.edu
-
- I snagged the most recent version of xflick I could find and some FLI files
- from Europe. The FLI files were lharced and zipped so I figured they most
- likely came off a PC. Anyways, when I try to view them using xflick on a
- Sun unix box I get "machine.fli, not a .fli file." But, when I try to view
- it on a PC it works fine. Is there some problem with xflick? the fli file?
- Or viewing fli files generated on a Dos machine using a Unix box? Any ideas?
- Could someone point me in the right direction of WORKING fli files on a UNIX
- machine so that I can test to make sure my copy of xflick is working? Thanks!
-
- - mike
-