home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!sifon!thunder.mcrcim.mcgill.edu!sobeco!rcorco!rcorsa!catnix!root
- From: root@catnix.UUCP (Wonder user (M.Simond))
- Newsgroups: can.general
- Subject: A Constitutional Convention?
- Message-ID: <459@catnix.UUCP>
- Date: 10 Nov 92 01:49:59 GMT
- References: <1deg22INNka1@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>
- Sender: michele%catnix@cam.org
- Organization: Rhinoceros, chargez!
- Lines: 16
-
-
- buckland@ucs.ubc.ca (Tony Buckland) writes:
- >
- >[...]
- > Selection by lottery? Now no interest group or party is represented
- >[...]
-
- Why not something ressembling a jury. Maybe I am wrong, but as
- I understand the process, if a jury cannot be put together for
- a trial, people are picked up randomly on the street to participate
- to that jury. And as far as I know, jury decisions are enforceable.
-
- > I don't think the notion of a constitutional convention would solve
- > anything.
-
- We cannot know before we try.
-