home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!auvm!SEQ.HULL.AC.UK!R.A.REESE
- Via: UK.AC.HULL.SEQ; 6 NOV 92 10:56:05 GMT
- X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.3 PL11]
- Original-Sender: R.A.Reese@uk.ac.hull.seq
- Message-ID: <STAT-L%92110606013290@VM1.MCGILL.CA>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.stat-l
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 10:50:45 WET
- Sender: "STATISTICAL CONSULTING" <STAT-L@MCGILL1.BITNET>
- From: "R.A.Reese" <R.A.Reese@SEQ.HULL.AC.UK>
- Subject: Re: rules about keeping research data
- In-Reply-To: <no.id>; from "Ronan M Conroy" at Nov 5, 92 5:02 pm
- Lines: 17
-
- > 1. The ID number is useful for tracking down missing or dud
- > information in the datafiles exported to the researcher, and
- > it isn't linkable to the original record unless you have
- > access to the original database system. Does this adequately
- > protect the confidentiality of the clients?
-
- Under UK law, the Data Protection Act applies to ANY personal information
- held on a COMPUTER, relating to a living identifiable individual. In other
- words, it doesn't matter how many coding or encryption schemes you have
- to go through, nor whether the real identities are not on the computer.
- So the DP Act applies and you would have to register and declare the
- content and use of the data.
-
- Note also that you don't have to store names and addresses to identify
- individuals. That's why the Census data are not made available as less
- than district aggregates - "the head of the household that has 8 members
- and a house with 6 bedrooms" might uniquely identify someone.
-