home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!bcm!convex!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!uvvm!klassen
- References: <9211101906.AA26361@csd01.cs.pge.com>
- Message-ID: <92315.171717KLASSEN@UVVM>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1992 17:17:17 PST
- Reply-To: Melvin Klassen <KLASSEN@UVVM.BITNET>
- Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.BITNET>
- Comments: Warning -- original Sender: tag was NETNEWS@UVVM.UVIC.CA
- From: Melvin Klassen <KLASSEN@UVVM.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Was Duke Down?
- Lines: 10
-
- In article <9211101906.AA26361@csd01.cs.pge.com>,
- TWB2%RatesRDS%FAR@CTS27.CS.PGE.COM says:
- >Did all recent senders get back returned mail messages from Duke? YES!
-
- >Or was this local to PG&E? We thought maybe our gateway was down, at first.
- Nope. One user ID was (past tense!) listed on the 'SAS-L@VTVM2' mailing-list
- but the ID is no longer valid on the DUKEMC (MC.DUKE.EDU) system.
-
- Properly-behaved mailers will return any "bounced" E-mail to the list-owner
- of the SAS-L mailing-list. The mailer at DUKEMC misbehaves! :-)
-