home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!WCUVAX1.BITNET!WALTERSAM
- X-Envelope-to: MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: IN%"MBU-L@TTUVM1"
- MIME-version: 1.0
- Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
- Message-ID: <01GR260S5RFIA0UJ63@WCUVAX1.BITNET>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.mbu-l
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1992 10:07:47 -0500
- Sender: "Megabyte University (Computers & Writing)" <MBU-L@TTUVM1.BITNET>
- From: Angela Murphy-Walters <WALTERSAM@WCUVAX1.BITNET>
- Subject: Over-admission of remedial students
- Lines: 31
-
- David E. Schwalm asks about students "taking courses (from a bean
- counter's perspective--'using resources') to no avail...." At the
- college where I did my undergraduate work it was a well known fact that
- many people were admitted who were not expected to succeed. In fact,
- there were advantages for the bean counters and others if too many at-risk
- students were admitted. First, for at least one trimester tuition and fees
- were being paid. Second, for those who were not at-risk the scene was a lot
- sunnier after that first trimester: it was much easier to get the courses
- you wanted, single rooms in the dorm were more readily available, lines in
- the cafeteria were significantly shorter.... I realize that these are not all
- terribly significant, but it did make a difference. We came in thinking that
- certain conditions would exist throughout our four years; by Thanksgiving it
- was much more pleasant than we expected. Another thing my college did (and
- BTW, this has all changed since the administration changed about 10 years
- ago) is put lots of students on probation who probably should have flunked
- out. If I remember right, my Freshman year about 1/3 of the class failed
- the first trimester and another 1/3 was on academic probation. Nearly all
- of the second group stayed another semester, paying their fees, before finally
- leaving. Perhaps the problem was lack of support and remediation, but those
- students who had chosen this college because of its high academic standards
- really didn't appreciate being held back. The next president of the college
- restored the high admission standards we had been told existed and the
- reputation of the college began to improve again. Better students came and
- were content to pay higher tuition rates, so the bean counters couldn't
- complain too much.
- Sorry for the endless paragraph. My point is, there may be some very
- good reasons why your university is admitting a lot of at-risk students and
- not supporting them. Perhaps discovering those reasons should precede efforts
- to remediate?
- Angela Murphy-Walters
- WALTERSAM@WCUVAX1
-