home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!PHYSICS.PURDUE.EDU!DANMAC
- Approved-By: "EDTECH Moderator" <21765EDT@MSU.BITNET>
- Message-ID: <EDTECH%92111100512076@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edtech
- Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:33:55 EST
- Sender: "EDTECH - Educational Technology" <EDTECH@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
- From: "Daniel L. MacIsaac" <danmac@physics.purdue.edu>
- Subject: re: education and virtual reality
- Lines: 28
-
- >>
- >> From: "M. Young" <MYOUNG@UCONNVM.BITNET>
- >>
- >> I disagree with STANKULI@UWF when he states that VR is just for
- >> "low level" sensory information. Recent ideas in cognitive psychology
- >> suggest that ALL learning (including higher level conceptual
- >> understanding) is "situated" in perceptual learning and experience.
- >>
- I believe this assertation runs contrary to much of the current thought in
- the philosophy of science (and of science education). While people are thought
- to learn starting from the concrete and moving to the abstract (eg Piagetian
- psychogenesis); "situating" all learning in perceptual learning and experience
- seems quite positivistic or empiricist. There are serious counter arguments
- to this position.
-
- Not that I'd ever disagree with cognitive psychology, of course :^).
-
- "Indeed, from childhood we have become familiar with the appearance of physical
- equations in non-Cartesian systems, such as polar coordinates, and in non-
- inertial systems, such as rotating coordinates..."
- - Steven Weinberg, Gravitation & Cosmology, p 92
- Dan MacIsaac, Grad student in Physics & Science Ed, danmac@physics.purdue.edu
-
-
- >>
- >> Consider the "mental models" used by experts when solving physics
- >> problems.
- >>
-