home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #26 / NN_1992_26.iso / spool / bit / listserv / edtech / 2326 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-10  |  907 b   |  21 lines
  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!paladin.american.edu!auvm!MSU.BITNET!ALLENG
  3. Approved-By:  "EDTECH Moderator" <21765EDT@MSU.BITNET>
  4. Message-ID: <EDTECH%92111100012739@OHSTVMA.ACS.OHIO-STATE.EDU>
  5. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edtech
  6. Approved: NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  7. Date:         Wed, 11 Nov 1992 00:01:54 EST
  8. Sender:       "EDTECH - Educational Technology" <EDTECH@OHSTVMA.BITNET>
  9. From:         "George.Allen" <ALLENG@MSU.BITNET>
  10. Subject:      DOS BACKUP
  11. Lines: 8
  12.  
  13. In times past, the DOS BACKUP command was generally scorned as being both
  14. unhelpful and unreliable.  Is this true of recent versions of DOS?  Since
  15. BACKUP comes free with DOS, I'd appreciate hearing from others as to any
  16. problems that may be associated with its use.  Many thanks.
  17.  
  18. George Allen <alleng@msu.edu>
  19. Director for Learning Technology
  20. College of Nursing, Michigan State University
  21.