home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!dgbt!netfs!ub!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!LSE.AC.UK!P.JACKSON
- From: P.Jackson@LSE.AC.UK (P Jackson)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.edstat-l
- Subject: Re: robustness and correlation
- Message-ID: <9211121701.A00217@smtplink.lse.ac.uk>
- Date: 12 Nov 92 16:01:06 GMT
- Sender: "Statistics Education Discussion" <EDSTAT-L@NCSUVM.BITNET>
- Reply-To: P Jackson <P.Jackson@LSE.AC.UK>
- Lines: 12
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Via: UK.AC.LSE; 12 NOV 92 16:01:33 GMT
-
-
- Surley it is when considering whether or not a correlation
- coefficient is significantly different from value (usually
- zero) that distributional assumptions are important.
- The coefficient itself does carry information regarding the
- linear component of the association between two variables,
- whatever the distribution, does it not ?
-
- Paul Jackson
- Dept Social Psychology
- LSE
- London
-