home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!auvm!FAC.ANU.EDU.AU!ANDALING
- Message-ID: <9211131148.AA16231@fac.anu.edu.au>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.csg-l
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1992 22:48:14 EST
- Sender: "Control Systems Group Network (CSGnet)" <CSG-L@UIUCVMD.BITNET>
- From: Avery Andrews <andaling@FAC.ANU.EDU.AU>
- Subject: meaning
- Lines: 53
-
- [Avery Andrews 921113.1047]
- (Bill Powers (921112.0900))
-
- >"The Iliad" is a phrase we use to refer to (a) something that we
- >have heard or read that Homer dictated to someone, (b) a particular book
- >with the marks "The Iliad" printed on the cover, and with printed words
- >inside like those that Homer purportedly said, although in most cases
- >not the same words (a translation). So "The Iliad" is the name of a
- >collection of perceptions, some of which are word-like objects, some of
- >which are book-like objects, some of which are memories, and some of
- >which are imagined scenes or people.
-
- I'm unsure about how all this really gets grounded out in
- perceptions, considering that the book has to contain what Homer
- putatively said, probably translated into some other language etc., &
- that people can use the word successfully without having much of a notion of
- what is in the book (as when the lit. teacher assigns it as reading to
- a group of students have never heard of it before).
-
- The consensual element seems to be being left out. Here's an example
- that might help to fill it in. Aeschylus wrote a play, Seven Against Thebes,
- which I have not read in any language, & so don't have much of a
- concept of. Suppose I go to the book store, & buy a book which says
- on the cover that it is Seven Against Thebes by Aeschylus.
-
- But when I start reading, something seems odd (maybe all the action
- seems to about a war of independence being fought on the Moon).
- So I take my book down to the library & compare it with the
- appropriately titled books there, & find it quite
- different. I conclude that I've been the deliberate butt of a wierd
- joke, or an accidental victim of a bookbinder's error.
-
- So, I speculate, part of a normal person's concept of literary works is
- that there are these places that have `standard copies' of works by
- given authors. They include libraries, and other collections maintained
- by supposed experts. How do we know that they are experts? Mostly,
- I guess because they say the more or less the same thing, for a wide
- range of cases, and, partly, because they give a general impression of
- knowing what they are talking out.
-
- So I'll contend that to get a perceptually based concept of the Iliad
- we need to invoke (a) some kind of social perception of expertise
- (b) perceptions of the apparent experts agreeing on whether a given
- book is a copy of the Iliad. And even people who would trust themselves
- to recognize copies of the book base their trust on these
- considerations, except that they encountered the experts first (or
- just happily assume that their bookseller did gull them
- once upon a time).
-
- I get the sense that there's some kind of `second order' perception
- going on, tho definitely not in the standard PCT sense.
-
- Avery.Andrews@anu.edu.au
-