home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!news.columbia.edu!cunixa.cc.columbia.edu!gmw1
- From: gmw1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu (Gabe M Wiener)
- Subject: Various things
- Message-ID: <1992Nov8.042646.10166@news.columbia.edu>
- Sender: usenet@news.columbia.edu (The Network News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixa.cc.columbia.edu
- Organization: Columbia University
- Date: Sun, 8 Nov 1992 04:26:46 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- a) The other day, I was talking about a technical design with someone,
- and they referred to the pending patent on the device. However, his
- pronunciation of "patent" rhymed with "latent." I've never heard the
- word "patent" pronounced any way other than with the first syllable
- pronounced like the name "pat." Has anyone else encountered "patent"
- prounounced with the long a?
-
- b) What areas of the U.S. still call carbonated beverages "pop" and
- not "soda" ?
-
- c) I was reading a 1720 mathematics textbook the other day, and I
- noticed the voluminous use of the typographical mark "&c." instead of
- "etc." Now, the ampersand obviously comes from a calligraphic "et,"
- so how did we move backwards from &c in printing to etc? You rarely
- see &c in typographic form.
-
-
- --
- Gabe Wiener - Columbia Univ. "This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings
- gmw1@cunixa.cc.columbia.edu to be seriously considered as a means of
- N2GPZ in ham radio circles communication. The device is inherently of
- 72355,1226 on CI$ no value to us." -Western Union memo, 1877
-