home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!mdisea!gix
- From: gix@mdd.comm.mot.com (Brian Gix)
- Subject: Re: Rush Limbaugh: Victory from Defeat
- Message-ID: <1992Nov6.222516.26424@mdd.comm.mot.com>
- Sender: news@mdd.comm.mot.com
- Organization: Motorola, Mobile Data Division - Seattle, WA
- References: <1992Nov5.040108.9614@s1.gov> <Bx9onK.KvB@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 1992 22:25:16 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- In article <Bx9onK.KvB@acsu.buffalo.edu> mjb@acsu.buffalo.edu (Matthew J. Bernhardt) writes:
- >lip@s1.gov (Loren I. Petrich) writes:
- >
- >> Our favorite radio boor has attempted to pull victory from
- >>defeat by calling the election a triumph for conservatism on the
- >>ground that Clinton had to move to the Right. And this is someone
- >>whose candidate lost. I somehow expected him to jump into the
- >>Sacramento River after this one, but his ingenuity has been as
- >>entertaining as ever.
- >
- > Yes, Bush lost, but because he had moved TO THE LEFT. That moderate
- >in conservative's clothing is a disgrace to the Republican Party. The voters
- >meted out punishment according. Unfortunately, the cure is worse than the
- >disease.
-
- Do tell. And exactly who did all those right-wingers vote for since
- they didn't vote for Bush? Did they actually vote for Clinton because he
- moved to the Right? Did they vote for Perot, who also is more moderate than Bush?
- Or did they (just to claim adherence to the lunitic-fringe) write in Rush Limbaugh?
-
- While I don't think Clinton got a mandate in favor of his policies, I think
- it's clear that he got a mandate against Bush's.
-
- --
- --Brian Gix Motorola
- gix@mdd.comm.mot.com Mobile Data Division
- (206) 487-5894 #include <disclaimer.h>
-