home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:9015 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:7916
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!bronze.ucs.indiana.edu!aaiken
- From: aaiken@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Andrew C. Aiken)
- Subject: Is God a Socialist?
- Message-ID: <Bx95vD.8yA@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>
- Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: bronze.ucs.indiana.edu
- Organization: Indiana University
- Date: Thu, 5 Nov 1992 16:59:36 GMT
- Lines: 70
-
- I have read several recent posts which said that God is a Socialist.
-
- Not surprisingly, the claim was made by Socialists. They claimed to
- know the economic Gospel, but made no arguments and no exegesis.
-
- Let me begin with a definition:
-
- Socialism is the state ownership of the means of production. More
- specifically, it based upon the proposition that each citizen is
- entitled to the same amount of wealth. If the achievement of this
- goal means economic leveling by way of taxation and social spending, then
- so be it. The Socialist considers his economic philosophy to be the
- extension of democracy to the means of property distribution.
-
- I do not mean this as a skewed definition, only one based upon the practice
- and advocacy of Socialism in modern times. The last line was taken from
- Michael Harrington.
-
- Now the Bible of course states (II Corinthians 9) that charity is the greatest
- of all virtues. But charity is voluntary; that is, one is not charitable
- unless one voluntarily helps the sick or the poor. The term "charity" does
- connote generousity with one's wealth, but this is but a small part of the
- true meaning of charity. Charity is a state of the spirit to which humans
- can only aspire.
- There have always been good people and bad people, and today there
- are those who are generous with what they have been lucky or skilled enough
- to acquire, and there are those who are miserly. But the imposition of an
- involuntary system of "charity", by which the state takes from the rich man
- his earnings, and gives a small fraction of the takings to the poor man
- (keeping the rest to feed itself), impoverishes the soul of both the rich
- man and the poor man. The rich man did not choose to give money to the state.
- He may be predisposed to earnestly helping the poor, but the gift is not
- voluntary. He goes to jail if he does not pay his taxes. God has given us
- freedom of choice: if we do not (as individuals) help the poor, then we
- shall be judged harshly for this. But if the state is the instrument of
- charity, then there is no voluntary exchange, no deliberate desire to do good.
- The poor man can get succor from the state, but he knows that the money
- comes unwillingly from the pockets of others. He may be materially better off
- as a result, but his soul is not enriched, since God does not guide the state.
- The state is human power, yet it creates no wealth, spiritual or material.
- Coercion can result in the material satisfaction of the masses, but what of
- spiritual satisfaction, the thirst for which no Stalin could extinguish?
- Thus, I do not think it is proper to call God a Socialist. Likewise,
- it is not proper to say that He is not. We can ratify or ignore our spiritual
- obligations, but God does not endorse our puny human economic systems. It is
- the love of money, not money itself, that is the root of all evil, since to
- love money, one must renounce the spiritual, and concentrate only upon the
- material. But to claim that men will be happy if only we provide for them
- materially (as the Socialist states) is to fall into the same trap. The
- Socialist, by conceiving the transfer of wealth as being the social good,
- loves money no less than the wicked miser.
-
-
-
- Comments welcome.
-
- Andrew Aiken
-
-
- P.S. This is not to say that the state has no role in facilitating charity.
- I believe that it does, but I deplore pure Socialism. Pure capitalism is
- not desirable either, but rather than proposing a "middle way" (welfare state),
- I consider a system of "progressive capitalism" to be most conducive to
- voluntary charity. Some of the New Deal and Great Society reforms were proper
- and necessary, but others were ill-conceived, and we should not make monuments
- of them.
-
- P.P.S. I have spoken here of the Christian God, of course, because it is my
- own belief, and it is the religion that I know best. I'd be interested in
- hearing divergent views from believers in other religions.
-