>> The prize for best crackpot spoof goes to Brad Wallet. Hagerman had a
>> chance at this prize, but blew it by submitting a couple serious articles.
>Hmm, as far as I can tell, Brad Wallet has posted only once in the
>last few weeks, and that post fully included my post, but the left
>Character was not '>'. Computerization simplifies plagiarism! :-)
You're right. Brad is disqualified. As you keep up these serious posts,
I have to disqualify you too; so the prize now goes to RVESTERM@vma for
his posting illustrating the proper use of repeated exclamation points.
Now if you had properly claimed that PHYSICISTS have ignored your PROVOCATIVE PRINCIPLES and that my ARROW-neous award for Brad's COMMUNICATION was a CONSPIRACY by all SCIENTISTS to discredit your SUPER-GENIUS inspired by DR. PENROSE and maintain the STATUS QUO ACCORDING to DR. GALILEO, DR. NEWTON, DR. EINSTEIN, and DR. HAWKING, then I might have considered giving you the award!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-)
Well, there goes my rating. (exactly 1000 for this article per my program)
Richard M. Mathews Richard.Mathews@West.Sun.COM Laisve!