home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!noc.msc.net!uc.msc.edu!shamash!ems!ems.cdc.com!mstemper
- From: mstemper@ems.cdc.com (Michael Stemper)
- Newsgroups: sci.math
- Subject: Re: 'Perfect' numbers
- Message-ID: <29060@nntp_server.ems.cdc.com>
- Date: 12 Oct 92 21:43:35 GMT
- References: <1992Oct8.132001.29075@ifi.uio.no> <FYU7JLK@math.fu-berlin.de> <Bvzsy7.B9E@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: sys@ems.ems.cdc.com
- Reply-To: mstemper@ems.cdc.com
- Organization: Empros Systems International, a division of Ceridian
- Lines: 25
- Nntp-Posting-Host: kirk.ems.cdc.com
-
- dagjo@ifi.uio.no (Dag Espolin Johnson) writes:
- >Does someone have a list of the first numbers (as many as possible) that are
- >'perfect'?
-
- This is taken from a post by Julien Cassaigne (Ecole Normale
- Supe'rieure) back in February. It probably should be in the
- FAQ, as this is the second time this month that I've answered it.
-
- 6
- 28
- 496
- 8128
- 33550336
- 8589869056
- 137438691328
- 2305843008139952128
- 2658455991569831744654692615953842176
-
- [from Sloane's Handbook of Integer Sequences, sequence #1744]
-
- --
- #include <Standard_Disclaimer.h>
- Michael F. Stemper
- Power Systems Consultant
- mstemper@ems.cdc.com
-