home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.math:13071 sci.physics:16373
- Newsgroups: sci.math,sci.physics
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!galois!riesz!jbaez
- From: jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez)
- Subject: Re: How do you draw a straight line?
- Message-ID: <1992Oct12.220926.19323@galois.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@galois.mit.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: riesz
- Organization: MIT Department of Mathematics, Cambridge, MA
- References: <1992Oct9.195430.22725@galois.mit.edu> <1992Oct12.083128.29023@nuscc.nus.sg>
- Date: Mon, 12 Oct 92 22:09:26 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Oct12.083128.29023@nuscc.nus.sg> scip1061@nuscc.nus.sg (Marc Paul Jozef) writes:
- >jbaez@riesz.mit.edu (John C. Baez) writes:
- >: In article <1992Oct8.115013.2533@nuscc.nus.sg> scip1061@nuscc.nus.sg (Marc Paul Jozef) writes:
- >: >
- >: > The spacetime metric of GR defines geodesics
- >: >in spacetime. A string or a rod or whatever
- >: >define world*sheets* in spacetime; `straightness'
- >: >of a line has nothing to do with geodesics of GR.
- >:
- >: While it's true that over time a rod covers a 2-dimensional surface
- >: in spacetime, the closest thing there is to a straight (spacelike) line
- >: in GR is a spacelike geodesic.
-
- > So what?
- > The correspondence may be `close', but it can
- > never be precise (except in static spacetimes
- > which have a unique timelike Killing-field,
- > so that there is a unique 3+1 splitting of
- > spacetime).
-
- So what? Close is the best you can do when it comes to trying to
- find a reasonable notion of straight lines on a curved spacetime.
- Close is good enough when it comes to the everyday notion of a "straight
- line", which assumes that line is not too long compared to
- characteristic length scale of the curvature.
-