home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!newsflash.concordia.ca!alcor.concordia.ca.Concordia.CA!seldin
- From: seldin@alcor.concordia.ca ( JONATHAN SELDIN )
- Subject: Re: A only if B
- Message-ID: <Bw2noB.6tE@newsflash.concordia.ca>
- Summary: Correct is A --> B
- Sender: seldin@alcor.concordia.ca
- Nntp-Posting-Host: alcor.concordia.ca
- Organization: Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1992 18:07:21 GMT
- Lines: 41
-
- In article writes:
- ...
- >In article <rkaivola.718902434@mits> rkaivola@mits.mdata.fi (Risto Kaivola) writes:
- >>
- >> The following is no doubt a little trivial for the participants of this
- >>group, but I hope someone is willing to help me, nevertheless.
- >> Exactly how should one formalize the English notion of 'only if'
- >>in the language of the propositional calculus?
- ... (Formalization of A only if B requested.)
- >>A --> B
- ... (blank lines omitted)
- >>Or, should this perhaps be B --> A (not in my opinion), or A <--> B
- >>(this last alternative is more likely to be correct than B --> A, in my
- >>opinion)?
- ...
- >>(Internet address: rkaivola@mits.mdata.fi)
- >
- >I'd go for:
- >
- >(B --> A) & (-B --> -A)
- >
- >
- >Antoni Diller
-
- No!!!
-
- Think of A if and only if B. This is A <--> B; A if B is clearly
- B --> A, and so A only if B must be A --> B.
-
- Another way to think of this is in terms of truth table values.
- In A only if B, the case that is excluded is that A is true and B
- is false; A only if B is true (truth functionally) in all other
- cases. This gives us the truth table for A --> B.
-
- So rkaivola@mits.mdata.fi was right the first time.
-
- --
- Jonathan P. Seldin
- Department of Mathematics seldin@alcor.concordia.ca
- Concordia University seldin@vax2.concordia.ca
- 7141 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H4B 1R6
-