home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!decwrl!atha!aupair.cs.athabascau.ca!burt
- From: burt@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca (Burt Voorhees)
- Newsgroups: sci.logic
- Subject: Re: A only if B
- Message-ID: <burt.718993396@aupair.cs.athabascau.ca>
- Date: 13 Oct 92 16:23:16 GMT
- References: <rkaivola.718902434@mits> <baljeual.718925223@uther> <burt.71895033
- Sender: news@cs.athabascau.ca
- Lines: 11
-
- >A-->B = if A then B
- >A<-->B = A if and only if B
- >A<--B = A only if B = if B then A This is read: A is true only if B is
- >true since a true statement cannot imply a falsehood.
-
- Appologies, this is clearly wrong. :( That's what I get for posting
- late at night and thinking about things like necessary and sufficient.
- Guess that puts me one up on Dogwood (Much Ado About Nothing) as he only
- wanted to be written down an ass. :):):)
- Let's try again: How about A only if B = (B-->A)&(-B-->-a)
- bv
-