home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pmafire!news.dell.com!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!igor.rutgers.edu!zodiac.rutgers.edu!leichter
- From: leichter@zodiac.rutgers.edu
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Subject: Re: Quantum cryptography: a flawed premise?
- Message-ID: <1992Oct13.142639.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu>
- Date: 13 Oct 92 18:26:39 GMT
- References: <1992Oct12.184051.1@zodiac.rutgers.edu> <1992Oct13.061724.25758@netcom.com>
- Sender: news@igor.rutgers.edu
- Organization: Rutgers University Department of Computer Science
- Lines: 31
- Nntp-Posting-Host: cancer.rutgers.edu
-
- In article <1992Oct13.061724.25758@netcom.com>, rcain@netcom.com (Robert Cain)
- writes:
- > leichter@zodiac.rutgers.edu writes:
- | :
- | : The attack against the *cryptosystem*, as opposed to the attack against QM,
- | : goes like this: The eavesdropper clones the photons and SAVES them - he
- |
- | How does he do this? I know of no way to "save" a photon. Somehow mirrors
- | would be involved and I think interaction with a mirror would alter the
- | polarization state.
- |
- Why? How do you think Alice sends the photons to Bob in the first place?
- Do you think they can only be propagated in a vacuum, with no mirrors,
- lenses, or other objects in the way? If so, this is hardly a very useful
- system.
-
- You should be able to transmit these photons through a fiber (which
- contains them by total internal reflection) without losing the important
- information. The fiber can be wrapped into a ring; you need an optical
- switch to get it into the ring at the start, and out at the end, but
- such things exist.
-
- Admitedly, keeping a photon going around a ring of fiber for, say, an
- hour is pretty unlikely. But remember that you can keep amplifying the
- signal while retaining its information by using a laser - that was the whole
- basis by which we cloned the original photon! In effect, you are coupling
- the original information to a laser pulse that you can keep feeding energy
- into to make up for the energy it loses. I see no fundamental reason why
- you can't keep the information stable as long as you like this way.
-
- -- Jerry
-