home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!boulder!ucsu!spot.Colorado.EDU!frechett
- From: frechett@spot.Colorado.EDU (-=Runaway Daemon=-)
- Subject: Re: pgp 2.0
- Message-ID: <1992Oct8.073512.27259@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Sender: news@ucsu.Colorado.EDU (USENET News System)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: spot.colorado.edu
- Organization: University of Colorado, Boulder
- References: <Bvpr2y.Fv7@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> <8084@public.BTR.COM>
- Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1992 07:35:12 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <8084@public.BTR.COM> grady@public.BTR.COM ( ) writes:
- >The mail server source of pgp2.0 was corrupt;
-
- Doubtful. From what I've heard over and over and over again, you need
- unzip1.10 (forgive me.. I'm not a PC person.. might be pkunzip1.10) to
- unpack pgp20.zip
-
- BTW, regarding your offer for someone to send you a copy of pgp2.0 for money..
- This might be grounds for prosecution under copyright infringment laws in the
- USA. At least that's how Phil's dicussion of PKP and their bass ackwards way
- of going about life. I'd suggest upgrading your unzipper first and see
- if that helps before you try getting someone wrapped up in a legal battle.
-
- Along these lines I'd like to know if anyone else has any information regarding
- PKP and if they plan to do anything about RSA licensing. It seems to me that
- they are just about to lose any control over RSA if pgp were to become
- widespread (god forbid). I think they'd do better if they came out with some
- sort of reasonable licensing agreement.
-
-
- ian (finger frechett@spot.colorado.edu for key)
-
- hmmm.. I should add an automatic reply to my mail handler to send out my key..
- hmmmmm...
-