home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.crypt
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sample.eng.ohio-state.edu!mckinley!butzerd
- From: butzerd@mckinley.eng.ohio-state.edu (Dane C. Butzer)
- Subject: Re: RSA claims 33 and 37 of U.S. patent 4,405,829
- Message-ID: <1992Oct7.145231.19795@ee.eng.ohio-state.edu>
- Sender: news@ee.eng.ohio-state.edu
- Organization: The Ohio State University Dept of Electrical Engineering
- Distribution: na
- Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1992 14:52:31 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- Just another (possibly naive) thought,
-
- Isn't it true that any ploynonmial in a computer is by default:
-
- polynomial mod 2^n
-
- n being the length in bits of the variable used to store the
- solution? And weren't there at least a few encrpytion programs with
- polynomials in them before RSA? Couldn't this be prior art, too? Or
- does prior art have to be intentional (ie. yes, the equations were mod
- 2^n, but that wasn't on purpose...)? Comments?
-
-
- Dane Butzer
- _______________________________________________________________________
- Standard disclaimer applies...
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-